UK businesses lack in-house security expertise to monitor threats 24/7. MDR provides outsourced threat detection and incident response for enterprises and mid-market firms.

Building an in-house Security Operations Center (SOC) for 24/7 threat monitoring is expensive and difficult. A SOC requires: continuous hiring of skilled security analysts (severe talent shortage in UK), expensive tooling (SIEM, EDR, UEBA), 24/7 staffing model (shift rotation, burnout, high turnover), and ongoing training. A typical in-house SOC costs £500,000-£1.5 million annually for 5-10 analysts, tooling, and infrastructure. Many UK organisations lack this budget or cannot find talent.
Managed Detection and Response (MDR) provides an alternative: outsource 24/7 threat monitoring and incident response to expert vendors. MDR providers maintain teams of analysts working 24/7, share tooling across multiple customers (reducing per-customer costs), provide continuous training and expertise, and take responsibility for detecting threats and responding to incidents. For many UK organisations, MDR is more cost-effective than in-house SOCs and provides better expertise.
MDR has evolved significantly in recent years. Early MDR was purely alert-based: vendor monitors alerts from customer security tools and responds. Modern MDR is proactive: vendor conducts threat hunting, identifies threats before alerts, and provides continuous risk assessments. Top-tier MDR vendors have incident responders on staff for rapid response to detected incidents.
MDR adoption in UK is accelerating. Cyber insurance providers increasingly require MDR or equivalent monitoring before issuing policies. Regulators view 24/7 monitoring as a control requirement. Board-level pressure for continuous threat monitoring is driving MDR adoption.
MDR provides multiple tangible benefits beyond simple alert monitoring. First, 24/7 visibility: threats detected 3am Sunday morning are investigated immediately rather than waiting until Monday business hours. Second, expert investigation: MDR analysts have investigated thousands of incidents across multiple industries and customers. They recognize attack patterns that would be invisible to smaller in-house teams. Third, incident response: when threats are confirmed, MDR typically includes incident response services: containment, forensic investigation, and remediation guidance.
Fourth, threat hunting: good MDR vendors don't just react to alerts—they proactively hunt for threats. Analysts search for indicators of compromise across customer environments, identifying active threats before damage occurs. Fifth, continuous learning: MDR vendors see threats across all customers and industries. They share intelligence about emerging threats, attack techniques, and indicators of compromise. Customers benefit from collective intelligence.
Sixth, compliance evidence: regulators and cyber insurance providers accept MDR as evidence of continuous monitoring. MDR provides documentation of monitoring activities, detected threats, and incident response outcomes. This documentation satisfies compliance requirements.
Seventh, scalability: as organisations grow, MDR scales with them. In-house SOCs struggle to hire enough analysts to keep up with growth. MDR simply scales vendor capacity.
MDR typically covers multiple security functions.
MDR providers receive alerts from customer security tools (EDR, SIEM, firewalls, email security). Analysts investigate each alert: Is this malicious or legitimate activity? Does it warrant escalation? MDR analysts have investigation playbooks for common alert types, enabling rapid triage. False positive filtering reduces alert volume reaching customers to only confirmed threats. See endpoint security for EDR context.
Proactive threat hunting searches for indicators of compromise across customer infrastructure. Analysts query logs and telemetry looking for suspicious patterns: unusual process execution, lateral movement attempts, data exfiltration indicators. Threat hunting uncovers active threats that haven't generated alerts yet. Hunting typically occurs weekly or monthly depending on MDR tier.
When threats are confirmed, MDR responds. Initial response includes: containment (isolate compromised endpoints), investigation (what did the attacker do?), and eradication (remove attacker access). For confirmed breaches, premium MDR includes forensic investigation and detailed incident reports. See ransomware protection for incident response context.
MDR vendors provide continuous threat intelligence: emerging attack trends, indicators of compromise affecting customers' industry, and recommendations for security improvements. Monthly or quarterly reports show: threats detected, attack patterns observed, and risk posture. Reports provide board-level visibility of security metrics.
Many MDR services include periodic vulnerability assessments: identify security gaps in customer infrastructure. Assessments provide remediation recommendations prioritized by risk. Premium MDR vendors help customers prioritize remediation efforts.
MDR services vary dramatically. Understanding tiers helps in vendor selection.
Most basic MDR: vendor monitors alerts from customer tools, triages false positives, escalates confirmed threats. No proactive threat hunting. No incident response beyond alert investigation. Cost: £30-£60 per endpoint monthly. Suitable for: organisations with some security tools and analysts who can respond to alerts.
Vendor monitors alerts continuously and hunts for threats monthly. Threat hunting uses customer logs and telemetry to proactively identify compromises. Escalation includes investigation context helping customer analysts respond. Cost: £60-£120 per endpoint monthly. Suitable for: organisations lacking in-house hunting capability.
Vendor monitors 24/7, hunts weekly or bi-weekly, includes incident response teams. When incidents are detected, vendor's responders investigate, contain, and provide detailed incident reports. Customers participate in response but vendor drives investigation. Cost: £120-£200 per endpoint monthly. Suitable for: organisations requiring expert incident response.
Vendor manages entire security infrastructure: deploys and manages SIEM, EDR, and monitoring tools; conducts continuous threat hunting and incident response; provides compliance reporting for regulations (GDPR, DORA, etc.). Vendor takes full responsibility for detection and response. Cost: £200-£400+ per endpoint monthly. Suitable for: large enterprises requiring comprehensive managed security.
MDR advantages: 24/7 coverage without shift rotation burden, expert analysts with cross-customer experience, continuous learning from multiple customers, scalability without hiring constraints, documented compliance evidence. Disadvantages: less direct control, potential for delayed response if vendor is overloaded, dependency on vendor performance.
In-house SOC advantages: direct control of response, customization to organisation-specific tools and processes, no external dependency. Disadvantages: high cost (£500k-£1.5m annually), difficulty hiring and retaining talent, 24/7 staffing burden, limited experience compared to vendor analysts.
Many organisations use hybrid approach: critical endpoints and systems monitored by in-house SOC, general infrastructure monitored by MDR. This balances cost, control, and expertise.
Verify vendor experience in your industry and geography. Ask: How many incident response engagements have you conducted? What are the most common attack patterns you see? How quickly can your team respond to confirmed incidents? Do you have staff in UK/EU for compliance and data residency?
Ask whether vendor includes incident response staff or only alert monitoring. Can vendor conduct forensic investigation? What's the typical response time from detection to initial containment? Premium MDR includes response teams; basic MDR doesn't. Budget accordingly. See phishing protection for understanding incident triggers in email.
MDR should integrate with existing security tools: EDR, firewalls, email security, SIEM. Verify vendor can ingest data from customer's existing tools without requiring tool replacement. Vendor lock-in (forced to use vendor's expensive tools) increases costs.
Verify vendor provides compliance documentation: audit trails, incident reports, threat hunting reports. GDPR and ISO 27001 require documented monitoring. Vendor should provide this evidence automatically.
Understand pricing model: per-endpoint, per-month? Hidden costs for incident response, forensics, or reporting? Get detailed pricing including all services and limits. Compare total cost of ownership against in-house alternatives.
Evaluate 3-5 MDR vendors based on above criteria. Request proposals including pricing, service levels, and compliance documentation. Negotiate contracts. Establish vendor kickoff meeting.
Provide vendor access to security tools (EDR, SIEM, firewalls, email security). Integrate vendor monitoring platform with customer systems. Establish escalation procedures: how are threats reported? How quickly? Conduct kickoff call with vendor and internal team.
Vendor begins 24/7 monitoring. Monitor vendor performance: alert response times, false positive rates, quality of investigations. Conduct weekly sync calls with vendor. Adjust escalation procedures based on early experience.
Conduct monthly reviews with vendor: What threats were detected? What hunting activities occurred? What are top risks? Provide feedback on alert quality. Engage vendor on remediation of identified risks. Plan quarterly business reviews assessing MDR value.
MDR provider isn't integrated with customer security tools. Vendor can't see security data. Monitoring is blind. Vendor must have access to EDR, SIEM, and other security tools.
When vendor detects threats, unclear who in customer organisation should be notified. Escalation is slow or ignored. Clear escalation procedures with phone numbers, email addresses, and on-call contacts are mandatory.
Customer expects MDR to prevent all breaches. Realistically, MDR detects and responds to breaches. Prevention is the customer's responsibility (through endpoint security, network segmentation, etc.). See remote worker security for prevention context.
MDR detects threats but customer lacks response capability. Containment is slow. Ensure customer has security staff or MDR includes incident response. Response capability is mandatory.
Vendor provides alerts but communication is poor. Customer doesn't understand threat severity or response options. Monthly business reviews are critical for communication and alignment.
MDR provides board-level visibility of threat detection and response. Leadership should be reporting on: (1) number of threats detected monthly, (2) investigation timelines (time from detection to investigation completion), (3) incident response timelines, (4) top threats and attack patterns observed, (5) remediation status of identified vulnerabilities, and (6) compliance evidence collected by MDR.
MDR vendors typically provide executive dashboards and monthly reports appropriate for board presentation. Use this data to communicate security posture to leadership.
MDR is now a standard security practice for UK organisations. A well-resourced organisation can select, contract, and operationalise MDR in 3-4 months. The investment is moderate: £30-£200 per endpoint monthly depending on tier. For a 500-person organisation (500 endpoints), annual cost ranges from £180,000-£1.2 million.
Compare this to in-house SOC costs (£500k-£1.5m annually) plus hiring and training burden. For most UK organisations, MDR is more cost-effective and provides better expertise than in-house alternatives.
Continuous threat monitoring is now a compliance requirement and board expectation. Your organisation should be asking: Who is monitoring our systems 24/7? What's our threat detection capability? Can we respond to incidents within minutes?
Monthly expert-curated updates empower you to protect your business with actionable cybersecurity insights, the latest threat data, and proven defences—trusted by UK IT leaders for reliability and clarity.
